Fig. 5
From: An integrated QTL and RNA-seq analysis revealed new petal morphology loci in Brassica napus L.
The overview of spatiotemporal transcriptomic analysis of the different parts of diversiform petals. The meaning of each circle was as follows: a: the DEGs density of BPB−D vs LPB−D; b: the heat map of DEGs of BPB−D vs LPB−D; c: the DEGs density of BPB−M vs LPB−M; d: the heat map of DEGs of BPB−M vs LPB−M; e: the DEGs density of BPB−P vs LPB−P; f: the heat map of DEGs of BPB−P vs LPB−P; g: the DEGs density of BPB−D vs SPB−D; h: the heat map of DEGs of BPB−D vs SPB−D; i: the DEGs density of BPB−M vs SPB−M; j: the heat map of DEGs of BPB−M vs SPB−M; k: the DEGs density of BPB−P vs SPB−P; l: the heat map of DEGs of BPB−P vs SPB−P; m: the DEGs density of BPF−D vs LPF−D; n: the heat map of DEGs of BPF−D vs LPF−D; o: the DEGs density of BPF−M vs LPF−M; p: the heat map of DEGs of BPF−M vs LPF−M; q: the DEGs density of BPF−P vs LPF−P; r: the heat map of DEGs of BPF−P vs LPF−P; s: the DEGs density of BPF−D vs SPF−D; t: the heat map of DEGs of BPF−D vs SPF−D; u: the DEGs density of BPF−M vs SPF−M; v: the heat map of DEGs of BPF−M vs SPF−M; w: the DEGs density of BPF−P vs SPF−P; x: and the heat map of DEGs of BPF−P vs SPF−P. Among them, the heat maps were drawn using log2(fold change) of FPKM, and the DEG densities were calculated with a sliding window of 100 Kbps and a step size of 10 Kbps