Skip to main content

Characterization of microalgal β-carotene and astaxanthin: exploring their health-promoting properties under the effect of salinity and light intensity

Abstract

Microalgae are promising sources of valuable carotenoids like β-carotene and astaxanthin with numerous health benefits. This review summarizes recent studies on producing these carotenoids in microalgae under different salinity and light-intensity conditions, which are key factors influencing their biosynthesis. The carotenoid biosynthesis pathways in microalgae, involving the methylerythritol phosphate pathway in chloroplasts, are described in detail. The effects of high salinity and light stress on stimulating astaxanthin accumulation in species like Haematococcus pluvialis and Chromochloris zofingiensis and their synergistic impact are discussed. Similarly, the review covers how high light and salinity induce β-carotene production in Dunaliella salina and other microalgae. The diverse health-promoting properties of astaxanthin and β-carotene, such as their antioxidant, antiinflammatory, and anticancer activities, are highlighted. Strategies to improve carotenoid yields in microalgae through environmental stresses, two-stage cultivation, genetic engineering, and metabolic engineering approaches are evaluated. Overall, this review highlights advancements in β-carotene and astaxanthin production reporting the different microalgal capability to produce carotenoids under different stress level like 31.5% increase in β-carotene accumulation in Dunaliella salina and astaxanthin productivity reaching 18.1 mg/L/day in Haematococcus lacustris. It also explores novel biotechnological strategies, including CRISPR–Cas9, for enhancing carotenoid yield.

Graphical Abstract

Introduction

Microalgae are vital components of ecosystems, functioning as photosynthetic microorganisms that harness light energy along with inorganic nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon dioxide (CO₂) to produce biomass and a range of bioactive compounds [1, 2]. Additionally, they are capable of synthesizing high-value metabolites, including carotenoids, which are of significant ecological and industrial importance [3]. Recent research has focused on microalgae as a promising source of bioactive compounds with the potential to enhance nutritional value and provide significant health benefits for both humans and animals [4, 5]. A varied class of terpenoid pigments found in many photosynthetic organisms are called carotenoids [6]. Apart from their vital roles in photosynthesis and photoprotection for phototrophs, carotenoids are also key parts of human diets and are vital for human health [7]. Carotenoids are produced in the chloroplasts around the nucleus of plants and algae, and their buildup only occurs in response to specific stressors [8]. Two prominent carotenoids produced by microalgae are β-carotene and astaxanthin. Astaxanthin and β-carotene are considered more important than many other carotenoids due to their unique and potent properties, making them highly valuable in health, nutrition, and commercial applications. β-Carotene is an orange-coloured carotenoid known as a provitamin A compound [3]. β-Carotene is a highly valuable biochemical compound functions as a dietary pigment, a precursor to vitamin A [9], and a potent antioxidant [10]. Microalgae are the primary source for the biosynthesis of β-carotene [11, 12]. Salt is a major environmental stressor for freshwater microalgae. Salt stress can impede photosynthesis and development which causes oxidative damage, and degrade chlorophyll [13]. Microalgae have developed a survival strategy to ensure the equilibrium of growth and stress responses in response to salinity stress by accumulating secondary metabolites like astaxanthin [14]. Under various stress situations, astaxanthin accumulation in lipid bodies outside of the chloroplast rises [15]. In Haematococcus sp., it accumulates in the cytoplasm while xanthophylls are localized and synthesized within the plastids of certain green microalgae [16]. A scant number of organisms possess the ability to synthesize astaxanthin like Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous, Haematococcus pluvialis, Chromochloris zofingiensis, Chlamydomonas nivalis, and certain species of Phaffia and Paracoccus [6]. Haematococcus pluvialis, which is one of the main natural astaxanthin source available on the market at the moment [8] and Chromochloris zofingiensis, which may develop vigorously to reach high cell densities in a variety of trophic circumstances [17,18,19] and is thought to be a possible substitute astaxanthin producer [20].

One of the best approaches for promoting astaxanthin and β-carotene synthesis in microalgae is high light intensity and saline conditions [21]. Microalgal carotenoid production is significantly influenced by stress conditions such as high light intensity, salt stress, nutrient deficiency, and excessive irradiation, which enhance secondary carotenoid synthesis by increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mitigating photo-oxidative damage. While primary carotenoids like lutein degrade under stress, secondary carotenoids such as β-carotene and astaxanthin accumulate, with β-carotene reaching high concentrations in lipid bodies. Cultivation techniques, including two-stage and continuous processes, further enhance astaxanthin production, while certain species maintain stable lutein production under stress, making them viable for large-scale cultivation. For lipid production, autotrophic and heterotrophic strategies are employed, with key stress factors such as light intensity, temperature, and nitrate availability playing crucial roles. Effective stress management is critical for optimizing metabolite and lipid yields in laboratory and pilot-scale systems as shown in Fig. 1 [22]. When exposed to intense light, astaxanthin and β-carotene productivity positively increases in a variety of microalgal species [23]. High salinity and light intensity induce the accumulation of β-carotene and astaxanthin in the green microalgae as a protective response to osmotic and oxidative stress [24]. Studies on microalgae have examined the routes and related enzymes involved in carotenogenesis. Algae and cyanobacteria produce carotenoid synthesis using distinct enzymes and genes [25]. Well-researched contenders for the synthesis of economically significant carotenoids include H. pluvialis, D. salina, and Chlorella sp. [26]. Carotenoids have several health benefits because of their antioxidative qualities, carotenoids are utilized as food supplements, colourants in aquaculture feed, and colouring agents in human food. They serve as antiinflammatory, anticarcinogenic, and antibacterial agents in medicinal preparations and cosmetics [27, 28]. While other carotenoids like lutein, zeaxanthin, and canthaxanthin also have health benefits, astaxanthin and β-carotene offer a broader range of applications and more potent biological effects. In the reports suggested by BCC Research, the global market value of carotenoids in 2022 was estimated to be $2.0 billion USD, whereas according to the forecasts the global carotenoid market value will increase to $2.7 billion USD by 2027 at a compound annual growth rate of 5.7% [29].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic representation showing the impact of stresses on carotenoid and biomass production (modified by Minhas et al. [22])

This review highlights recent advances in β-carotene and astaxanthin production under salinity and light stress, their health benefits, carotenoid biosynthesis pathways, stress-induced carotenogenesis mechanisms, and metabolic engineering strategies for enhanced yields. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of recent advancements in β-carotene and astaxanthin production under stress conditions also it emphasizes the molecular mechanisms driving carotenogenesis and explores cutting-edge biotechnological strategies, including CRISPR–Cas9 and metabolic engineering, for optimizing carotenoid yields in microalgae.

Carotenoid biosynthesis pathways in microalgae

Carotenoids are synthesized in microalgae through the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway [30, 31] located in the chloroplast [14]. The chloroplast is where primary carotenoids, which are vital for cellular viability, are made. When under stress, secondary carotenoids generate cytoplasmic lipid vesicles that are bigger [32]. Isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) is a precursor for quinines, sterols, phytol of chlorophylls, and carotenoids. The IPP can be synthesized from two independent pathways. One is the mevalonate pathway, whereas the other is the non-mevalonate pathway (1-deoxy-D-xylulose phosphate pathway) [25]. The pathway starts with the synthesis of the five carbon precursors isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) and its isomer dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) [33]. These precursors are combined by geranyl diphosphate synthase (GPPS) and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase (GGPPS) to produce the 20-carbon geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP) [34]. In some microalgae like H. pluvialis, GGPPS alone can catalyse the full conversion from the 5-carbon precursors to GGPP [35]. IPP isomerase has been found in two copies of H. pluvialis. Due to the high light intensity, one of the two isomerase enzymes that accumulate carotenoids in the cytoplasm had enhanced expression and upregulation [36].

GGPP molecules are then condensed by phytoene synthase (PSY) to form the first carotenoid phytoene. Phytoene is subsequently desaturated by phytoene desaturase (PDS) and converted to lycopene via enzymes like ζ-carotene isomerase (Z-ISO), ζ-carotene desaturase (ZDS) and carotene isomerase [37]. At this point, lycopene can enter either the α-branch or the β-branch of the pathway. In the α-branch, lycopene is cyclized by lycopene ε-cyclase (LCYE) to α-carotene, which is then converted to lutein by cytochrome P450 enzymes like β-hydroxylase (CYP97A) and epsilon hydroxylase (CYP97C) [38]. In the β-branch, lycopene is cyclized by lycopene β-cyclase (LCYB) to β-carotene [39]. β-Carotene can be converted to zeaxanthin by β-carotene hydroxylase (CHYB) or to astaxanthin via the ketolase enzyme (BKT). BKT produces canthaxanthin first, and then astaxanthin synthase (CHYB) adds hydroxyl groups to generate astaxanthin as summarized in Fig. 2 [33].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Biosynthesis pathway of carotenoids. The following enzymes are displayed: β-LCY, β-cyclase; β-OHase, β-carotene hydroxylase; CRTISO, carotenoid isomerase; DMAPP, dimethylallyl diphosphate; DXP, deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate; DXS, DXP synthase; ε-LCY, ε-cyclase; ε-OHase, ε-carotene hydroxylase; G3P, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; GGPP, geranylgeranyl diphosphate; GGPPS, GGPP synthase; MEP, methylerythritol E 4-phosphate; PDS, phytoene desaturase; PSY, phytoene synthase; ZDS, ζ-carotene desaturase; Z-ISO, ζcarotene isomerase [40]

Production dynamics of β-carotene and astaxanthin in microalgae under light and salt stress

Impact of light stress on microalgal physiology, biomass, and carotenoid accumulation

Microalgal cells are susceptible to significant effects from light stress. Microalgae can initiate lipid synthesis when exposed to high light levels, with different species and strains needing differing levels of light to produce the most lipids [41]. Microalgae have evolved defence mechanisms against intense light, such as quickly lowering their chlorophyll-a concentration to prevent photodamage and preserve a high cell density. Light intensity also affects the spatial arrangement of cells within biofilms, which has an impact on the microalgae's general physiology and structure [42]. Microalgal cells' physiology is impacted by light exposure because it causes oxidative stress, which can harm cellular constituents. Microalgae enhance the production of β-carotene and astaxanthin, as potent antioxidants to mitigate oxidative stress and protect themselves under adverse conditions. By neutralizing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and converting surplus light energy to heat, these carotenoids can shield the photosynthetic system from harm [43, 44]. ROS can be produced when there is an excessive reduction in the electron transport chain in chloroplasts due to high light intensity. The xanthophyll cycle supported by carotenoids such as astaxanthin plays a crucial role in non-photochemical quenching [45].

Furthermore, light stress can change how genes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis are expressed, which increases the amount of these pigments produced. It has been found that light causes certain microalgae, including H. pluvialis, D. salina, C. zofingiensis, and Euglena gracilis, to accumulate carotenoids [46, 47]. High light intensity significantly enhances the biomass productivity of various microalgae, with species-specific responses observed. For instance, D. salina thrives at 1000 µmol photons/m2/s [48], while Oscillatoria sp. achieves 3 g DCW/L under 3000 lux [49]. A detailed comparison of different microalgae and their responses to high light conditions is summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Microalgal diverse strategies and responses to varying light intensities and growth conditions

The ability of microalgae to accumulate carotenoids in large quantities makes them valuable objects for biotechnological production [60]. Microalgae such as D. salina, H. lacustris, and some Chlorella spp. are rich sources of carotenoids [48, 61]. In H. lacustris [21, 62], D. salina [63], C. zofingiensis [17], and T. obliquus [41] exposure to high-intensity lighting stimulates the production of carotenoid pigments. The two most intriguing carotenoids available in the global market are astaxanthin and β-carotene [60]. D. salina is the most commercially significant microalga for natural β-carotene synthesis, with the ability to accumulate up to 14% of its dry weight [53]. An increase in light intensity from 100 to 200 µmol photons/m2/s resulted in a 31.5% increase in β-carotene accumulation in D. salina Y6 [63] and other strains of Dunaliella also showed an increase in productivity of β-carotene when exposed to intensity above 200 µmol photons/m2/s. A separate study showed, when light intensity was adjusted from 100 to 1000 µmol photons/m2/s, D. salina's β-carotene content increased as well, reaching 3.1% of dry cell weight as shown in Table 2 [64]. D. bardawil contained 0.16% β-carotene on a dry weight basis. When exposed to high light intensity (250 µmol photons/m2/s), β-carotene content increased to 8–14% dry weight [66]. A secondary carotenoid in the xanthophyll group is astaxanthin and its forerunner is β-carotene. According to reports, many microalgae produce and accumulate a considerable amount of astaxanthin when subjected to stressful conditions [75]. H. lacustris [76] and C. zofingiensis [20, 77] are recognized producers of astaxanthin. Chlamydomonas nivalis [78], Scenedesmus vacuolatus [79], and Neochloris wimmeri [79] were also reported to contain lower concentrations of astaxanthin. One of the best conditions for promoting astaxanthin production in microalgae is high light intensity [21]. Under high light conditions (>400 μmol/m2/s), astaxanthin accumulates massively in the cytoplasm and lipid vesicles of H. pluvialis cells to act as a photoprotective agent against excessive energy absorption and singlet oxygen formation [80]. According to a separate study, 9.5 µg m/L of astaxanthin productivity occurs under high light in H. pluvialis [68]. There are positive results of an increase in the productivity of astaxanthin when exposed to high-intensity light (100 and 400 µmol photons/m2/s) on heterotrophically grown cultures of H. lacustris NIES-14 [23]. In additional research, H. lacustris JNU35 used 150 µmol photons/m2/s to produce 18.1 mg/L/day [67]. According to a study light source and photoperiod significantly impacted H. pluvialis growth. Under low light intensity (40.6 ± 3.05 μmol/m2/s), white plasma light with 24:0 light/dark cycle produced the best results like highest specific growth, maximum biomass and cell density. One study showed that 90 μmol/m2/s light intensity led to higher astaxanthin content compared to no light [71]. According to one study, H. pluvialis also produces 9.5 µg/mL of astaxanthin when exposed to high light intensity [68]. In a different study the quality of light was also used to check its effect on the biomass and carotenoid production in photoperiod of 12 h:12 h light/dark cycle and light intensity of 100 μmol photon/m2/s, the mixed red and blue light showed more balanced growth and high photosynthetic activity. The individual blue light stimulated carotenoid biosynthesis and individual red light primarily supports biomass accumulation. The mixed ratio of blue and red light with high proportion of blue and red light enhanced carotenoid and biomass accumulation, respectively. Thus, different light intensity and light quality can be used to stimulate the synthesis of carotenoids in microalgae mainly β-carotene and astaxanthin.

Table 2 Microalgal carotenoid production under different stress conditions

Impact of salt stress on microalgal physiology, biomass, and carotenoid accumulation

Microalgae are susceptible to many effects of salt stress, including decreased cell development, decreased chlorophyll concentration, inhibition of photosynthesis, and morphological alterations [13]. When H. pluvialis is exposed to salt stress, its cell wall hardens, its volume increases, and eventually it turns into immovable cysts. These morphological modifications are linked to several intricate signalling events [13].

Early signalling

Calcium signalling

Calcium (Ca2+) acts as a universal secondary messenger in response to salt stress, regulating downstream effector proteins, such as calmodulin (CaM), Ca2+ dependent protein kinases, and CaM-dependent protein kinases [81, 82]. Ca2+ has several properties that make it an ideal ubiquitous signalling molecule. Its cytosolic concentration is easily mutable because it is low compared to other internal or exterior areas. Numerous proteins are capable of identifying and halting (Ca2+) alterations. Numerous Ca2+-permeable channels or transporters are available to accurately control these variations in concentration [81]. The decarboxylation of glutamate to γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is regulated by the Ca2+/CaM protein [83]. γ-Amino butyric acid (GABA) is a water-soluble, non-proteinaceous, four-carbon molecule that has been shown to accumulate in response to various abiotic stressors [84].

GABA and nitric oxide signalling

GABA is a signalling molecule involved in cell growth and enhancing abiotic stress tolerance in plants [85]. Under salt stress, it also helps to maintain the C/N balance and acts as a scavenger of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [86]. It has been proposed that GABA improves abiotic stress tolerance in plants by increasing photosynthetic efficiency and development, as well as by activating some defence mechanisms, such as enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants [87, 88]. Using GABA during salt stress alters the nitrate-uptake system's signalling and the antioxidant enzyme functions of the N metabolic pathways [89].

It is also related to nitric oxide (NO) accumulation under stress conditions [85]. Nitric oxide is an important molecule involved in plant growth, development, and tolerance to abiotic stress [90]. It can activate antioxidant enzyme defence against oxidative stress induced by salt stress and aid in the recovery of the damaged photosynthetic system [90]. When subjected to different abiotic stressors have demonstrated decreased chlorophyll loss followed by repair due to exogenous NO application using NO donors [91].

Reactive oxygen species signalling

ROS are second messengers induced by salinity stress, also associated with Ca2+ signalling [83]. It can regulate cell growth and metabolite synthesis but can also cause oxidative damage [92]. Salinity raises the ROS concentration, which results in anomalies in the organelle ultrastructure and the loss of beneficial electrolytes [93]. Antioxidant enzymes and antioxidants, such as carotenoids, are essential mechanisms for eliminating excessive ROS in microalgae (Fig. 3) [24].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Possible mechanisms explaining microalgae responses to salt stress

Downstream signalling

Gene expression

Salinity-induced signals can affect the gene expression of microalgae cells, and the effects are related to salt concentrations [94]. Low salt concentrations can promote the growth of some microalgae by upregulating growth-related genes, such as rbcL, rbcS, and NR [94, 95].

Osmotic homeostasis

Under high-dose salt stress, microalgae need to maintain ionic and osmotic homeostasis [96]. Strategies include regulating intracellular Na+ and K+ concentrations through ion transporters and accumulating compatible solutes like glycerol to maintain water potential [97]. Through the exclusion of Na+, selective transporters of Na+ preserve the balance of Na+ and K+ in cells. Furthermore, several studies have shown that maintaining the K+/Na+ ratio contributes to salinity tolerance. Thus, the ability of a large concentration of K+ to persist aids in the exclusion of Na+ from the cell. [98].

Metabolic adjustments

Salt stress can upregulate genes related to starch catabolism and downregulated genes for gluconeogenesis, providing building blocks for the storage of lipids and carotenoids [33]. Expression of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) for fatty acid synthesis is induced under salt stress in various microalgae species [99, 100].

Omics approaches

Omics approaches, such as genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics, are employed to study the changes occurring under salt stress. Integrating diverse "omics" methodologies such as transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and genomes is novel and extensively used instrument for managing adaptation and tolerance to salinity. Studies using "omics" to examine control and salinity-stressed plants have allowed for the clear demonstration of modifying characteristics, genes, proteins, and metabolomes that are essential for giving salt stress tolerance [101]. Transcription factors like MYB, WRKY, and bHLH play important roles in regulating gene expressions under salinity [92].

Effect of salt stress on biomass and carotenoid accumulation in microalgae

Strict salt stress can be toxic and inhibit growth in microalgae. Therefore, an optimal salt concentration should be chosen carefully based on the microalgal species and the cultivation goals (biomass or carotenoid production) [72]. Research suggests that β-carotene levels can be increased by 2–4 times at 1–3 M NaCl concentrations as opposed to low salinities [65]. Astaxanthin production is induced in H. pluvialis as a response to various stress factors. High salinity stress promotes astaxanthin accumulation by inducing oxidative stress via osmotic and ionic imbalances [102]. Studies have shown that exposing H. pluvialis to high NaCl concentrations (>0.5 M) can elevate astaxanthin levels by more than 2.0-fold [103]. According to the study 1% (0.17 M) NaCl treatment for 10 days increased astaxanthin content from 3.53 to 17.7 mg/g in H. pluvialis [69]. In a separate study of H. pluvialis, melatonin (MT) addition enhanced carotenogenic gene expression and induced a 1.20-fold increase in astaxanthin accumulation under N-starvation and 1 g/L salt stress [104]. Also, under 0.8% of NaCl, astaxanthin productivity of 80 pg/ml is seen in H. pluvialis [105]. In S. obliquus, when concentration is increased from 0 to 50 Mm NaCl, then astaxanthin accumulation occurs up to 18% of its dry weight [70]. The highest fucoxanthin yield of 79.40 ± 0.95 mg/g dry weight (DW) was obtained with 36.27 g/L salt addition in Tisochrysis lutea [106]. In Coccomyxa onubensis 100 mM NaCl significantly boosted growth rate and biomass productivity. 500 mM NaCl enhanced lutein content by 47% to 7.80 mg/g DW, although cell growth was inhibited [107]. In another study, Coccomyxa onubensis under 100 mM NaCl significantly boosted growth rate and biomass productivity [108].

NaCl treatment amplified the effect of linoleic acid (LA) on boosting astaxanthin accumulation, with LA increasing astaxanthin content by 1.25-fold in the presence of 20% NaCl (w/v) in Chlorella sorokiniana [73]. One study found that increasing NaCl concentration from 0.5 M to 1.0 M significantly increased astaxanthin content from around 0.9–1.8% of dry weight in Chlorococcum [71]. Research suggests that β-carotene levels can be increased by 2–4 times at 1–3 M NaCl concentrations as opposed to low salinities [65]. Increasing salinity from 1.5 M NaCl to 3.5 M NaCl also increased β-carotene accumulation [66]. Since D. salina can grow in high salinity, it is economical to cultivate it in seawater with a high β-carotene output, perhaps avoiding microbial contamination according to research prominent productivity of the order of 3,267 μg/mL carotenoid was obtained by the marine strain D. salina (DUN5), particularly at mean salt concentrations of 2.5 M [109].

Effect of combined stress (light and salinity) on biomass and carotenoid accumulation in microalgae

The combined effect of salinity and highlight shows a synergistic impact. For example, H. pluvialis cultivated under 1 M NaCl and 800 μmol/m2/s light exhibited astaxanthin levels over 5 times higher than cultures grown under regular conditions [65]. In C. zofingiensis, salinity treatment combined with high light increased astaxanthin yield by 7.53-fold compared to the control [72]. In another study, H. pluvialis at 0.25 mM γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) facilitated a 3.24-fold increase in astaxanthin productivity under high light with 2 g/L salinity treatment [110]. In Scenedesmus sp., 0.59 mg/g of astaxanthin was produced under the combined effect of high light intensity and salt stress. For the accumulation of β-carotene, the combined effects of salt and light stress are also found to work synergistically. When compared to non-stressed control cultures, D. salina cells were grown in 2 M NaCl, and 1000 μmol/m2/s light had a β-carotene concentration that was nearly 6 times higher. In D. salina under salt stress, combined with high light at high temperatures and nutrient deficiency, β-carotene content achieved 13% of DW [65]. D. bardawil accumulates large amounts of β-carotene under conditions of high light intensity and salinity stress [111]. At 3.5 M NaCl and 250 μmol/m2/s light, β-carotene content reached 14–16% dry weight. β-Carotene was found to be localized in globules within the inter-thylakoid spaces of the chloroplast. The globules were composed of β-carotene, lipids, and protein. β-Carotene likely serves a photoprotective role in D. bardawil under high light and salinity stress [66]. Cells, dietary β-carotene is connected to enhanced immunological function [112]. Under conditions of strong light and salt stress, a mutant C. zofingiensis bkt1 may accumulate large levels of three carotenoids: lutein (13.81 mg/g DW), β-carotene (7.18 mg/g DW), and zeaxanthin (7.00 mg/g DW) [14]. All the results of different stresses are summarized in Table 2.

Health benefits of microalgal-based astaxanthin and β-carotene

In the food sector, microalgae are becoming crucial each year, more and more foods incorporating microalgae are being introduced to the market [75]. Because of their potential for commercialization, microalgae have garnered significant attention in studies recently [76]. Microalgae are a potent source of carotenoids. Provitamin A compounds such as α-carotene, β-carotene, astaxanthin, violaxanthin, neoxanthin, and violaxanthin can be produced in significant amounts by Spirulina, Chlorella, Dunaliella, and Haematococcus [77]. There are several bioactive compounds that have been approved as the source of human food and are derived from some microalgae. For instance, to a certain extent, oil high in astaxanthin from H. pluvialis and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) from Schizochytrium sp. can be ingested [78]. It is anticipated that thousands of bioactive chemicals can be isolated from eukaryotic microalgae and more than 200 from cyanobacteria [79]. Numerous bioactivities have been demonstrated by β-carotene, a pigment that is widely present and involved in the photosynthetic process in microalgae [113]. The most prevalent dietary provitamin A can be transformed into vitamin A (VA, retinol), a micronutrient essential to human health [100].

Astaxanthin

The natural pigment astaxanthin is found in many aquaculture species [114]. With a potency of 110 times more than that of vitamin E and ten times greater than other carotenoids, it is recognized as the most potent naturally occurring antioxidant [115]. Due to astaxanthin's exceptional ability to scavenge free radicals as well as its antiaging, antiinflammatory, antihypertensive, and anticancer qualities (Fig. 4) [116]. It is frequently used in functional foods, medications, and cosmetics [35]. As of right now, astaxanthin produced from microalgae accounts for just 1% of the global astaxanthin market. Furthermore, the cost of producing natural astaxanthin (USD 1800/kg) is significantly higher than that of producing it chemically (USD 1000/kg) [117]. Therefore, increasing microalgae's astaxanthin output is crucial for commercialization. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has effectively approved astaxanthin generated from microalgae for direct human consumption [118]. Regarding the current primary natural astaxanthin source, H. pluvialis has been utilized in the biotechnology industry to produce astaxanthin with an annual yield of 300 tons of biomass [119]. With attached cultivation, this species can accumulate up to 5% DW of astaxanthin [120]. H. pluvialis changes from green, motile cells to red cyst cells with a high astaxanthin concentration when growth conditions are unfavourable [102]. Numerous studies have taken advantage of tactics to increase astaxanthin accumulation, including nutrient deficiency, intense light, and chemical addition. The synthetic production of astaxanthin involves the use of petrochemical sources, raising concerns about food safety, possible toxicity in the finished product, pollution, and sustainability [121]. Figure 4 illustrates astaxanthin's primary impacts.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Diagram depicting the powerful health benefits of astaxanthin and β-carotene and their sources

As a defence mechanism or in response to physical harm, inflammation is a complicated series of immunological responses that can be prevented or treated with astaxanthin [122]. As it can prevent inflammation from starting, astaxanthin is crucial in preventing illnesses related to the central nervous system [123, 124]. This beneficial carotenoid also reduces bacterial infections-induced stomach irritation. It has been claimed that astaxanthin generated from microalgae can decrease the generation or expression of inflammatory mediators and cytokines, as well as the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase that can causes diseases like, atherosclerosis, or inflammatory bowel disease and brain inflammatory disease [125].

β-Carotene

β-Carotene is a hydrocarbon carotenoid that is pure and is found in algae, fungi (Phaffia rhodozyma), and plants (carrots, mangos, and pumpkins, among others) [126, 127]. β-Carotene is a precursor to vitamin A and has antioxidant and antiinflammatory properties [128, 129]. It can be converted to vitamin A as needed by the body [130]. Vitamin A is essential for vision, immune function, growth, and development [126]. D. salina has high quantities of β-carotene [131]. Microalgae have a high concentration of carotenoids, which typically make up 0.1–0.2% of their dry mass [132]. Up to 13% of D. salina's biomass is produced as β-carotene. Carotenoids that have been chemically synthesized currently account for 97–98% of the market [133]. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Community, Japan, the World Health Organization (WHO), and other international organizations and experts have acknowledged β-carotene as a food additive, a nutritional supplement, and a precursor to VA [53]. The significant biological action of organically generated β-carotene makes it useful for treating eye illnesses, cancer prevention, antioxidation, antiaging, animal colouring, and boosting immunological and reproduction in animals [128, 134]. Epidemiological studies suggest an inverse correlation between β-carotene intake and risk of certain cancers like lung, prostate, and stomach cancer [135]. The antioxidant properties of β-carotene may help protect cells from oxidative damage that can lead to cancer. As an antioxidant that scavenges radicals, β-carotene lowers lipid peroxidation when present [136]. β-Carotene may help reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. It inhibits the oxidation of LDL cholesterol, preventing plaque buildup in arteries [137]. Some studies found higher β-carotene levels associated with lower risk of coronary artery disease. By stimulating spleen cells, dietary β-carotene is connected to enhanced immunological function [112]. Currently, β-carotene products on the market are predominantly synthetic, while products extracted from natural sources occupy only a small fraction. Synthetic all trans-β-carotene dominates due to factors such as lower production costs and scalability [138]. However, natural cis-β-carotene isoforms, extracted from sources like microalgae, have been shown to be more bioactive and potent than their synthetic counterparts. This superiority highlights the untapped potential of natural β-carotene and suggests a shift towards large-scale extraction and purification from natural sources in the future.

Therapeutic benefits of astaxanthin and β-carotene

The health advantages have been the subject of several investigations and published research publications. Here is a summary of a few therapeutic advantages based on published study data. As a result, a large number of synthetic carotenoids made by isomerization, condensation, and dehydration of carbonyl compounds are being marketed. To produce chemical carotenoids (Witting processes), two phosphonium salts and one dialdehyde molecule are usually mixed [139]. These compounds are subsequently isomerized to produce carotenoids such as astaxanthin, and β-carotene [28].

Anticancer activity

Carotenoid's anticancer properties may offer protection against a range of human cancers, including intestinal, lung, oral, prostate, breast, and leukemic cancers [140]. However, among other ways that carotenoids fight cancer, they also cause restricted cell proliferation. β-Carotene, fucoxanthin, astaxanthin, lutein, and zeaxanthin have all been linked to a decreased risk of cancer in earlier research [103]. Initial evidence of vitamin A's potential as an anticancer agent first came to light in the 1960s. These discoveries subsequently motivated scientists and researchers to look into β-carotene's potential as an anticancer agent because it was the precursor [141]. According to the study's authors, arrest of the cell cycle, apoptosis, and metastasis are the most frequent processes that carotenoids follow [140]. Astaxanthin helps to reduce tumour size and burden [142].

Antioxidant activity

Reactive oxygen species (ROS), free radicals that are produced as a byproduct of regular metabolic processes [143]. At lower concentrations, though, these free radicals function as a signalling molecule and are essential for preserving cellular homeostasis and function [144]. Among the most varied classes of pigments, carotenoids have strong antioxidant properties and function as a brake on free radicals. Furthermore, it inhibits the production of free radicals by stopping oxidation processes [145, 146].

The most prevalent carotenoids in microalgae are fucoxanthin, violaxanthin, β-carotene, zeaxanthin, and astaxanthin [147]. These compounds have antioxidant qualities. Examples of good sources of β-carotenes are D. salina, Scenedesmus almeriensis (lutein and β-carotene), and Chlorella vulgaris (a strong source of astaxanthin) [148, 149]. Astaxanthin decreases the production of ROS within cells by modifying the enzymes that react to oxidative stress and by inhibiting the Sp1/NR1 signalling pathway, a symptom of oxidative stress [150, 151]. Astaxanthin boosted the amount of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase as well as the synthesis of Nrf2 and Nrf2-targeted proteins [151]. Additionally, it was discovered that when carotenoids were coupled with several other antioxidants, such as vitamin E, their ability to scavenge free radicals was increased.

Antiinflammatory activity

β-Carotene has been shown in various preclinical in vitro experiments to prevent and decrease diabetes, a chronic low-grade inflammatory illness with common consequences [152]. Numerous studies indicate that consuming a diet high in carotenoid-rich foods may be beneficial in preventing the cardiovascular problems associated with diabetes [153]. According to reports, oxidative stress generated in adipose tissue causes dysregulated adipocyte production of proinflammatory adipokines, which is linked to the aetiology of obesity and diabetes [154]. The impact of carotenoids on stroke has been the subject of numerous investigations. Nevertheless, no additional research or trials have been conducted to demonstrate that carotenoids shield the body from stroke. Many studies have shown that some carotenoids and vitamins can lower homocysteine levels, which has led to the belief that carotenoids may protect blood vessels from stroke. A larger-scale clinical experiment is currently being conducted to investigate the impact of carotenoids on stroke and brain health [155, 156]. Astaxanthin has been shown in several studies to have anticancer properties. The activation of many tumour metastasis suppressors, including maspin, Kai1, breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1, and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4, has been revealed to be the mechanism by which astaxanthin functions as a new metastasis inhibitor on the human breast cell line T47D [157]. Furthermore, astaxanthin has been shown to have a cytotoxic effect on ovarian cancer cells by inactivating the NF-κB signalling system and promoting apoptosis [158]. By inhibiting PPAR-γ, astaxanthin has also demonstrated antiproliferative effects in leukaemia K562 cells [159].

Antidiabetes activity

Carotenoids have been shown to have promise in the treatment and management of diabetes, according to a recent study. It has been demonstrated that carotenoids reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in humans [160]. It has also been discovered that there is a negative correlation between glucose levels and carotene intake [161]. Prior research has indicated an antagonistic correlation between β-carotene and fasting blood sugar levels [128]. Consuming foods high in antioxidants may reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes [161].

Advance strategies and genetic modifications employed in different microalgae species to increase astaxanthin and β-carotene accumulation

One effective strategy is the application of abiotic stress conditions, such as salt stress and light stress, which can induce these carotenoids accumulation in microalgae as a protective mechanism against oxidative stress (Table 3). There are several strains which has undergone random mutagenesis, chemical mutagens like N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) and ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) are used to induce random mutations, potentially leading to strains with enhanced carotenoid accumulation. In Coelastrum sp. C1-G1, carotenoid content increased about 2.0-fold over the mother strain using EMS mutagenesis [174]. The MNNG mutant strain H. pluvialis MT 2877, known as the astaxanthin-overproduction strain, produced four times as much astaxanthin as the WT strain [168]. Under various culture conditions, C. zofingiensis bkt1, a chemical mutagen via MNNG, can accumulate high concentrations of three important carotenoids, e.g., zeaxanthin, lutein, and β-carotene [169]. A method called adaptive evolution involves subjecting microalgae strains to gradual selective pressures, such as salt stress or specific compound exposure, to obtain strains with desired phenotypes. Chlorella sp. AE10 was subjected to adaptive evolution for 138 days (46 cycles) to improve its tolerance to 30 g/L salt, resulting in the strain Chlorella sp. S30 with upregulated genes related to CO2 fixation under salt stress [167]. Another method that involves the introduction or overexpression of salt-tolerance genes like nhaP (Na+/H+ antiporter), codA (choline oxidase), and Dps (DNA-binding proteins) in various microalgae species called targeted genetic engineering [175]. Genetic engineering of C. zofingiensis with a modified norflurazon-resistant endogenous pds gene resulted in up to 54.3% higher astaxanthin production [35]. Transformation and expression of dxs and psy genes in Phaeodactylum tricornutum, increased fucoxanthin content by 2.4-fold and 1.8-fold, respectively [172]. Transgenic D. salina with bkt and chyb genes from H. pluvialis, enabling astaxanthin biosynthesis and better tolerance to high light [170]. Manipulating the key enzymes and genes involved in the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway can also help in enhancing carotenoid production like overexpression of endogenous phytoene desaturase (PDS) in the chloroplasts of H. pluvialis led to astaxanthin yields of up to 34.3 mg/L, surpassing the wild-type production of 18.0 mg/L [62]. In Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, deletion of the zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP) gene using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)–Cas9 resulted in a 56-fold increase in zeaxanthin concentration [11], while the double deletion of ZEP and CpFTSY enhanced growth and zeaxanthin content [176].

Table 3 Genetic modifications in different microalgae species to increase carotenoid accumulation

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome modification is one of the most intriguing new gene editing methods because of its ease of use and adaptability [173]. It has been demonstrated to work well in a range of microalgae [177]. Although, modifications were required to lessen the harmful impact of Cas9 on the algae strain, the first successful application of CRISPR/Cas9 in microalgae was shown in 2014 on C. reinhardtii [176, 178]. Since then, Chlamydomonas transformation using the CRISPR system has been carried out several times, for example, to increase the content of lipids and pigments [179], increase the productivity of triacylglycerol [180,181,182], increase lipid accumulation [183]. Various other research also successfully used CRISPR/Cas9 to increase the production of several carotenoids in D. salina [184] and C. reinhardtii [176]. Overexpression of phytoene synthase (PSY) from consensus regions of multiple species increased β-carotene production by 3-fold (31.8 mg/g DCW) [19]. Additionally, overexpression of endogenous orange protein (OR) and its mutant form (CrORHis) boosted β-carotene, and total carotenoid levels in C. reinhardtii [163, 185]. Heterologous expression of genes has also been explored. The expression of the bifunctional CrtYB (phytoene-β-carotene synthase) gene from Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii increased β-carotene by 38%, respectively [164]. Furthermore, the introduction of the bkt1 gene from H. pluvialis into C. reinhardtii enabled the production of keto-carotenoids, which are not naturally synthesized by this microalga [165, 186]. To capitalize on this potential of astaxanthin and β-carotene, advancements in extraction technologies are crucial. One promising innovation is supercritical carbon dioxide (CO₂) extraction, a method that has gained traction for isolating carotenoids and other bioactive compounds. This technique leverages supercritical CO2's unique properties, such as low viscosity and high diffusivity, to achieve efficient, selective, and environmentally friendly extraction [138]. Supercritical CO2 extraction is already widely applied and holds promise for improving the yield and purity of natural cis-β-carotene, paving the way for its broader adoption in industries like food, pharmaceuticals, and cosmetics.

Advances in processing technologies and sustainability

Recent innovations in extraction, encapsulation, and stabilization methods have enhanced the functionality and industrial applicability of microalgal-derived products, particularly carotenoids. Also, new extraction and encapsulation methodologies, optimized for large-scale production, have paved the way for microalgal-based bioactives to transition from niche markets to mainstream applications. The solvent extraction method is a widely utilized technique for isolating natural compounds, such as pigments, from microalgal sources. However, this approach is associated with several limitations, including high solvent and energy demands, potential toxicity of certain solvents, and suboptimal extraction efficiencies [187, 188]. To address these challenges, a range of alternative methods, collectively referred to as green extraction techniques, have been developed. These advanced methodologies include ultrasound-assisted extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, pulsed electric field-assisted extraction, pressurized liquid extraction, aqueous two-phase systems, and supercritical fluid extraction, all of which aim to enhance efficiency, reduce environmental impact, and ensure safety [189]. Encapsulation technologies enhance the dispersibility, stability, and bioavailability of carotenoids while reducing degradation caused by heat, light, and oxygen. Carotenoids derived from microalgae, such as astaxanthin and fucoxanthin, demonstrate significant antioxidant properties and are more potent compared to other pigments [190]. Advanced green extraction techniques, such as microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and high-voltage electric discharge (HVED), improve the yield, purity, and sustainability of carotenoid extraction [191]. In a study by Georgiopoulou et al. [192], Chlorella vulgaris was subjected to MAE for recovery of high-added value bioactive compounds. Results showed, MAE yielded more quality yield than conventional solid–liquid extraction (SLE). Encapsulation reduces chemical degradation and preserves sensory attributes like colour and aroma, enhancing product shelf life and consumer acceptability. Encapsulation supports the incorporation of carotenoids into diverse food matrices without compromising their bioactivity [193]. Technologies like spray drying and nano-emulsion formation facilitate the design of stable, bioavailable food-grade carotenoid delivery systems [191]. Despite technological advances, commercial applications of encapsulated carotenoids are limited by regulatory ambiguities and high production costs, more research is needed to standardize encapsulation materials and methods for broader industrial adoption. Microalgae-based products, while promising for their economic potential and sustainability applications, face significant environmental challenges due to energy-intensive cultivation, dewatering, and drying processes. Autotrophic systems have higher energy and water demands compared to heterotrophic systems, with substantial impacts on global warming potential, ecotoxicity, and resource use [194]. Pigment and polyunsaturated fatty acid production are particularly energy-intensive [195,196,197]. Strategies like pressurized filtration with lyophilization and transitioning to renewable energy sources can reduce environmental footprints by up to 95% [198]. Integrating microalgae cultivation into biogas plants using the stacked modular open raceway pond (SMORP) system improves sustainability. While the traditional biogas setup showed better environmental performance, the microalgae-integrated system demonstrated economic feasibility with a net present value of €2.57 million and an internal rate of return of 14.1%, leveraging waste heat, CO2, and digestate from biogas plants. Challenges include high energy use, material costs, and optimizing nutrient and CO2 efficiency [199]. Despite these hurdles, the system shows promise for reducing chemical fertilizer use, CO2 emissions, and producing high-value bioproducts, aligning with circular economy goals and sustainable waste management strategies. Achieving sustainability and economic viability requires process optimization, renewable energy integration, and technological advancements, supported by policy initiatives and market demand for eco-friendly products.

Conclusion and future perspective

Microalgae are a promising natural source of high-value carotenoids like astaxanthin and β-carotene that offer numerous health benefits. Environmental factors, particularly high light intensity, and salinity, can induce the accumulation of these carotenoids in microalgae as a protective response against oxidative stress. Elucidating the carotenoid biosynthesis pathways and the molecular mechanisms underlying stress-induced carotenogenesis has provided valuable insights for metabolic engineering efforts. Strategic application of abiotic stresses like high light intensity and salinity can substantially elevate carotenoid accumulation in microalgae, though the optimal conditions are species-specific. H. pluvialis and D. salina are the current industrial workhorses, other oleaginous green microalgae like C. zofingiensis and Tetraselmis sp. are also promising alternate sources. Further improvements in carotenoid productivity are anticipated through advanced biotechnological interventions such as genetic engineering to overexpress rate-limiting enzymes, promoter modifications and the CRISPR–Cas9 system. CRISPR–Cas9 and metabolic engineering are powerful tools for optimizing β-carotene and astaxanthin production by precisely modifying metabolic pathways. CRISPR–Cas9 enables targeted gene knockouts, activation, or repression to enhance flux through carotenoid biosynthesis while reducing competing pathways. Metabolic engineering complements this by overexpressing key enzymes (e.g., PSY, PDS, LCYB, crtW, crtZ), increasing precursor availability (e.g., GGPP), and improving host tolerance to carotenoid accumulation. Synthetic biology further allows pathway redesign and dynamic regulation in microbial hosts, ensuring balanced flux and high yields. These strategies make carotenoid production more efficient and economically viable for industrial applications. Adaptive laboratory evolution and mutagenesis approaches could also generate strains with superior carotenogenic capabilities. Integrating upstream and downstream bioprocesses through biorefinery concepts will be crucial for commercial viability. As microalgal carotenoids transition from high-value niche products to commodity nutraceuticals and food ingredients, resolving challenges around scalability, cost-effectiveness, and regulatory compliance will facilitate their widespread adoption across industries like food, feed, pharmaceutics, and cosmetics. Scaling microalgal production of β-carotene and astaxanthin to industrial levels faces challenges like low yields, cultivation inefficiencies, energy-intensive harvesting, and high costs. Solutions include genetic and metabolic engineering to enhance productivity, hybrid cultivation systems combining open ponds and photobioreactors, and low-energy harvesting methods like flocculation or supercritical CO2 extraction. Standardizing processes and leveraging co-products can improve economic viability, while integrating wastewater recycling, renewable energy, and carbon capture reduces environmental impact. These innovations, combined with compliance with regulatory standards, are essential for sustainable and cost-effective industrial-scale production. Integrating microalgal cultivation with wastewater treatment or carbon capture and utilization processes can contribute to the sustainability and economic feasibility of the process. Overall, this multidisciplinary research arena holds immense potential for rewarding fundamental insights and transformative biotechnological applications. These advancements collectively provide a pathway for achieving sustainable, high-yield production of carotenoids at an industrial scale.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

IPP:

Isopentyl pyrophosphate

MEP:

Methylerythritol phosphate

DMAPP:

Dimethylallyl diphosphate

GPPS:

Geranyl diphosphate synthase

GGPPS:

Geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase

GGPP:

Geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate

PSY:

Phytoene synthase

PDS:

Phytoene desaturase

ISO:

Isomerase

ZDS:

ζ-Carotene desaturase

LCYE:

Lycopene ε-cyclase

LCYB:

Lycopene β-cyclase

CHYB:

β-Carotene hydroxylase

BKT:

β-Ketolase

DCW/L:

Dry cooling coil water/Leave

CaM:

Calmodulin

C/N:

Carbon/nitrogen

GABA:

Gamma amino butyric acid

NO:

Nitric oxide

rbcL:

Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase

rbcS:

Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit

ACCase:

Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase

MYB:

Myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog

bHLH:

Basic helix loop helix

MT:

Melatonin

DW:

Dry weight

LA:

Linoleic acid

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

VA:

Vitamin A

LDL:

Low density lipoproteins

Nrf2:

Nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor

MNNG:

N-Methyl-N’-nitrosoguanidine

CRISPR:

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats

HVED:

High-voltage electrical discharges

MAE:

Microwave-assisted extraction

SLE:

Solid–liquid extraction

SMORP:

Stacked modular open raceway pond

References

  1. Guedes AC, Amaro HM, Malcata FX. Microalgae as sources of carotenoids. Mar Drugs. 2011;9(4):625–44. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/md9040625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Yu X, Chen L, Zhang W. Chemicals to enhance microalgal growth and accumulation of high-value bioproducts. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:56. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00056.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lu S, Li L. Carotenoid metabolism: biosynthesis, regulation, and beyond. J Integr Plant Biol. 2008;50(7):778–85. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00708.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Darvish M, Jalili H, Ranaei-Siadat SO, Sedighi M. Potential cytotoxic effects of peptide fractions from Dunaliella salina protein hydrolyzed by gastric proteases. J Aquat Food Prod Technol. 2018;27(2):165–75. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/10498850.2017.1414095.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sedighi M, Jalili H, Ranaei-Siadat SO, Amrane A. Potential health effects of enzymatic protein hydrolysates from Chlorella vulgaris. Appl Food Biotechnol. 2016;3(3):160–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.22037/afb.v3i3.11306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodriguez-Concepcion M, Avalos J, Bonet ML, Boronat A, Gomez-Gomez L, Hornero-Mendez D, Limon MC, Meléndez-Martínez AJ, Olmedilla-Alonso B, Palou A, Ribot J, Rodrigo MJ, Zacarias L, Zhu C. A global perspective on carotenoids: Metabolism, biotechnology, and benefits for nutrition and health. Prog Lipid Res. 2018;70:62–93. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.plipres.2018.04.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Watkins JL, Pogson BJ. Prospects for carotenoid biofortification targeting retention and catabolism. Trends Plant Sci. 2020;25(5):501–12. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.12.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lemoine Y, Schoefs B. Secondary ketocarotenoid astaxanthin biosynthesis in algae: a multifunctional response to stress. Photosyn Res. 2010;106(1–2):155–77. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11120-010-9583-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen W, Chen G. The roles of vitamin a in the regulation of carbohydrate, lipid, and protein metabolism. J Clin Med. 2014;3(2):453–79. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/jcm3020453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Monte J, Bernardo J, Sá M, Parreira C, Galinha CF, Costa L, Casanovas C, Brazinha C, Crespo JG. Development of an integrated process of membrane filtration for harvesting carotenoid-rich Dunaliella salina at laboratory and pilot scales. Sep Purif Technol. 2020;233: 116021. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116021.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Baker R, Günther C. The role of carotenoids in consumer choice and the likely benefits from their inclusion into products for human consumption. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2004;15(10):484–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tifs.2004.04.0094.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta AK, Seth K, Maheshwari K, Baroliya PK, Meena M, Kumar A, Vinayak V. Harish Biosynthesis and extraction of high-value carotenoid pigments from algae. Front Biosci. 2021;26(6):171–90. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.52586/4932.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sinetova MA, Sidorov RA, Medvedeva AA, Starikov AY, Markelova AG, Allakhverdiev SI, Los DA. Effect of salt stress on physiological parameters of microalgae Vischeria punctata strain IPPAS H-242, a superproducer of eicosapentaenoic acid. J Biotechnol. 2021;331:63–73. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.03.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ren Y, Sun H, Deng J, Huang J, Chen F. Carotenoid production from microalgae: biosynthesis, salinity responses and novel biotechnologies. Mar Drugs. 2021;19(12):713. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/md19120713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Y, Peng J. Growth-associated biosynthesis of astaxanthin in heterotrophic Chlorella zofingiensis (Chlorophyta). World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;24(9):1915–22. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11274-008-9692-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eonseon J, Polle JW, Lee HK, Hyun SM, Chang MJ. Xanthophylls in microalgae: from biosynthesis to biotechnological mass production and application. J Microbial Biotechnol. 2003;13(2):165–74.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sun Z, Zhang Y, Sun L, Liu J. Light elicits astaxanthin biosynthesis and accumulation in the fermented ultrahigh-density Chlorella zofinginesis. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67(19):5579–86. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b01176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu J, Mao X, Zhou W, Guarnieri MT. Simultaneous production of triacylglycerol and high-value carotenoids by the astaxanthin-producing oleaginous green microalga Chlorella zofingiensis. Bioresour Technol. 2016;214:319–27. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.112.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen J, Liu L, Wei D. Enhanced production of astaxanthin by Chromochloris zofingiensis in a microplate-based culture system under high light irradiation. Bioresour Technol. 2017;245:518–29. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu J, Sun Z, Gerken H, Liu Z, Jiang Y, Chen F. Chlorella zofingiensis as an alternative microalgal producer of astaxanthin: biology and industrial potential. Mar Drugs. 2014;12(6):3487–515. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/md12063487.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Liyanaarachchi VC, Nishshanka GKSH, Premaratne RGMM, Ariyadasa TU, Nimarshana PHV, Malik A. Astaxanthin accumulation in the green microalga Haematococcus pluvialis: effect of initial phosphate concentration and stepwise/continuous light stress. Biotechnol Rep. 2020;28: e00538. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Minhas AK, Hodgson P, Barrow CJ, Adholeya A. A review on the assessment of stress conditions for simultaneous production of microalgal lipids and carotenoids. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:546. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00546.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang Z, Wang B, Hu Q, Sommerfeld M, Li Y, Han D. A new paradigm for producing astaxanthin from the unicellular green alga Haematococcus pluvialis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016;113(10):2088–99. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/bit.25976.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao Y, Wang HP, Han B, Yu X. Coupling of abiotic stresses and phytohormones for the production of lipids and high-value by-products by microalgae: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2019;274:549–56. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Takaichi S. Carotenoids in algae: distributions, biosyntheses and functions. Mar Drugs. 2011;9(6):1101–18. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/md9061101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Galarza JI, Gimpel JA, Rojas V, Arredondo-Vega BO, Henríquez V. Over-accumulation of astaxanthin in Haematococcus pluvialis through chloroplast genetic engineering. Algal Res. 2018;31:291–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.algal.2018.02.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh DP, Khattar JS, Rajput A, Chaudhary R, Singh R. High production of carotenoids by the green microalga Asterarcys quadricellulare PUMCC 5.1.1 under optimized culture conditions. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(9):e0221930. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0221930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Novoveská L, Ross ME, Stanley MS, Pradelles R, Wasiolek V, Sassi JF. Microalgal carotenoids: a review of production, current markets, regulations, and future direction. Mar Drugs. 2019;17(11):640. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/md17110640.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Publishing B. Global Carotenoids Market Size, Share & Growth Analysis Report. BCC Research LLC. 2022. https://www.bccresearch.com/market-research/food-and-beverage/the-global-market-for-carotenoids.html.

  30. Velmurugan A, Kodiveri MG. Genetic manipulation for carotenoid production in microalgae an overview. Curr Res Biotechnol. 2022;4:221–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.crbiot.2022.03.005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Swapnil P, Meena M, Singh SK, Dhuldhaj UP, Harish MA. Vital roles of carotenoids in plants and humans to deteriorate stress with its structure, biosynthesis, metabolic engineering and functional aspects. Curr Plant Biol. 2021;26:100203. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.cpb.2021.100203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nagarajan J, Ramanan RN, Raghunandan ME, Galanakis CM, Krishnamurthy NP. Carotenoids. In: Galanakis CM, editor. Nutraceutical and functional food components. United Kingdom: Elsevier; 2017. p. 259–96. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/B978-0-12-805257-0.00008-9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Mao X, Zhang Y, Wang X, Liu J. Novel insights into salinity-induced lipogenesis and carotenogenesis in the oleaginous astaxanthin-producing alga Chromochloris zofingiensis: a multi-omics study. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020;13(1):73. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13068-020-01714-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Sun Z, Li T, Zhou Z, Jiang Y. Microalgae as a source of lutein: chemistry, biosynthesis, and carotenogenesis. In: Posten C, Feng Chen S, editors. Microalgae biotechnology (Vol 153). Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland; 2015. p. 37–58. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/10_2015_331.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu J, Sun Z, Gerken H, Huang J, Jiang Y, Chen F. Genetic engineering of the green alga Chlorella zofingiensis: a modified norflurazon-resistant phytoene desaturase gene as a dominant selectable marker. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(11):5069–79. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00253-014-5593-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sun Z, Cunningham FX, Gantt E. Differential expression of two isopentenyl pyrophosphate isomerases and enhanced carotenoid accumulation in a unicellular chlorophyte. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(19):11482–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1073/pnas.95.19.11482.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Cunningham FX, Gantt E. Genes and enzymes of carotenoid biosynthesis in plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1998;49(1):557–83. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.557.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Varela JC, Pereira H, Vila M, León R. Erratum to: production of carotenoids by microalgae: achievements and challenges. Photosyn Res. 2016;127(2):285–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11120-015-0183-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Cordero BF, Couso I, Leon R, Rodriguez H, Vargas MA. Isolation and characterization of a lycopene ε-cyclase gene of Chlorella (Chromochloris) zofingiensis. Regulation of the carotenogenic pathway by nitrogen and light. Mar Drugs. 2012;10(12):2069–88. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/md10092069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Nisar N, Li L, Lu S, Khin NC, Pogson BJ. Carotenoid metabolism in plants. Mol Plant. 2015;8(1):68–82. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Maltsev Y, Maltseva K, Kulikovskiy M, Maltseva S. Influence of light conditions on microalgae growth and content of lipids, carotenoids, and fatty acid composition. Biology. 2021;10(10):1060. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/biology10101060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Gao Y, Bernard O, Fanesi A, Perré P, Lopes F. The effect of light intensity on microalgae biofilm structures and physiology under continuous illumination. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):1151. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41598-023-50432-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kumari S, Satapathy S, Datta M, Kumar S. Adaptation of microalgae to temperature and light stress. In: Roy S, Mathur P, Chakraborty AP, Saha SP, editors. Plant stress: challenges and management in the new decade. Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland; 2022. p. 123–34. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-3-030-95365-2_8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Mutschlechner M, Walter A, Colleselli L, Griesbeck C, Schöbel H. Enhancing carotenogenesis in terrestrial microalgae by UV-A light stress. J Appl Phycol. 2022;34(4):1943–55. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10811-022-02772-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Faraloni C, Di Lorenzo T, Bonetti A. Impact of light stress on the synthesis of both antioxidants polyphenols and carotenoids, as fast photoprotective response in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: new prospective for biotechnological potential of this microalga. Symmetry. 2021;13(11):2220. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/sym13112220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kato S, Shinomura T. Carotenoid synthesis and accumulation in microalgae under environmental stress. In: Jacob-Lopes E, Queiroz MI, Zepka LQ, editors. Pigments from microalgae handbook. Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland; 2020. p. 69–80.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Pereira S, Otero A. Haematococcus pluvialis bioprocess optimization: Effect of light quality, temperature and irradiance on growth, pigment content and photosynthetic response. Algal Res. 2020;51: 102027. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.algal.2020.102027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Xu Y, Ibrahim I, Wosu C, Ben-Amotz A, Harvey P. Potential of new isolates of Dunaliella salina for natural β-carotene production. Biology. 2018;7(1):14. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/biology7010014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Kwan PP, Banerjee S, Shariff M, Md YF. Influence of light on biomass and lipid production in microalgae cultivation. Aquac Res. 2021;52(4):1337–47. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/are.15023.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Li Y, Zhou W, Hu B, Min M, Chen P, Ruan RR. Effect of light intensity on algal biomass accumulation and biodiesel production for mixotrophic strains Chlorella kessleri and Chlorella protothecoide cultivated in highly concentrated municipal wastewater. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109(9):2222–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/bit.24491.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kumawat G, Vyas P, Choudhary S, Meena M, Harish. Microalgal biodiesel as a sustainable and green energy alternative: A metabolomic approach. Biomass Bioenergy. 2024;186:107257. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107257

  52. Nzayisenga JC, Farge X, Groll SL, Sellstedt A. Effects of light intensity on growth and lipid production in microalgae grown in wastewater. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020;13:4. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13068-019-1646-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Metsoviti MN, Papapolymerou G, Karapanagiotidis IT, Katsoulas N. Effect of light intensity and quality on growth rate and composition of Chlorella vulgaris. Plants. 2019;9(1):31. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/plants9010031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Tian X, Lin X, Xie Q, Liu J, Luo L. Effects of temperature and light on microalgal growth and nutrient removal in turtle aquaculture wastewater. Biology. 2024;13(11):901. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/biology13110901.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Bialevich V, Zachleder V, Bišová K. The effect of variable light source and light intensity on the growth of three algal species. Cells. 2022;11(8):1293. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/cells11081293.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Takeshita T, Ota S, Yamazaki T, Hirata A, Zachleder V, Kawano S. Starch and lipid accumulation in eight strains of six Chlorella species under comparatively high light intensity and aeration culture conditions. Bioresour Technol. 2014;158:127–34. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Palikrousis TL, Manolis C, Kalamaras SD, Samaras P. Effect of light intensity on the growth and nutrient uptake of the microalga Chlorella sorokiniana cultivated in biogas plant digestate. Water. 2024;16(19):2782. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/w16192782.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Sui Y, Harvey PJ. Effect of light intensity and wavelength on biomass growth and protein and amino acid composition of Dunaliella salina. Foods. 2021;10(5):1018. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/foods10051018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Xiao Y, He X, Ma Q, Lu Y, Bai F, Dai J, Wu Q. Photosynthetic accumulation of lutein in Auxenochlorella protothecoides after heterotrophic growth. Mar Drugs. 2018;6(8):283. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/md16080283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Silva SC, Ferreira ICFR, Dias MM, Barreiro MF. Microalgae-derived pigments: a 10-year bibliometric review and industry and market trend analysis. Molecules. 2020;25(15):3406. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/molecules25153406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Mulders KJM, Lamers PP, Martens DE, Wijffels RH. Phototrophic pigment production with microalgae: Biological constraints and opportunities. J Phycol. 2014;50(2):229–42. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/jpy.12173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Galarza JI, Arredondo Vega BO, Villón J, Henríquez V. Deesterification of astaxanthin and intermediate esters from Haematococcus pluvialis subjected to stress. Biotechnol Rep. 2019;23: e00351. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wu M, Zhu R, Lu J, Lei A, Zhu H, Hu Z, Wang J. Effects of different abiotic stresses on carotenoid and fatty acid metabolism in the green microalga Dunaliella salina Y6. Ann Microbiol. 2020;70(1):48. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13213-020-01588-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Lamers PP, Janssen M, De Vos RCH, Bino RJ, Wijffels RH. Carotenoid and fatty acid metabolism in nitrogen-starved Dunaliella salina, a unicellular green microalga. J Biotechnol. 2012;162(1):21–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.04.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Rammuni MN, Ariyadasa TU, Nimarshana PHV, Attalage RA. Comparative assessment on the extraction of carotenoids from microalgal sources: Astaxanthin from H. pluvialis and β-carotene from D. salina. Food Chem. 2019;277:128–34. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.066.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ben-Amotz A. Industrial production of microalgal cell-mass and secondary products—major industrial species: Dunaliella. In: Richmond A, editor. Handbook of Microalgal culture. 1st ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2003. p. 273–80.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  67. Wang F, Gao B, Wu M, Huang L, Zhang C. A novel strategy for the hyper-production of astaxanthin from the newly isolated microalga Haematococcus pluvialis JNU35. Algal Res. 2019;39: 101466. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.algal.2019.101466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhekisheva M, Zarka A, Khozin-Goldberg I, Cohen Z, Boussiba S. Inhibition of astaxanthin synthesis under high irradiance does not abolish triacylglycerol accumulation in the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis (Chlorophyceae)1. J Phycol. 2005;41(4):819–26. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.0022-3646.2005.05015.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Gao Z, Meng C, Chen YC, Ahmed F, Mangott A, Schenk PM, Li Y. Comparison of astaxanthin accumulation and biosynthesis gene expression of three Haematococcus pluvialis strains upon salinity stress. J Appl Phycol. 2015;27(5):1853–60. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10811-014-0491-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Salama ES, Kim HC, Abou-Shanab RAI, Ji MK, Oh YK, Kim SH, Jeon BH. Biomass, lipid content, and fatty acid composition of freshwater Chlamydomonas mexicana and Scenedesmus obliquus grown under salt stress. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2013;36(6):827–33. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00449-013-0919-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Yuan JP, Chen F, Liu X, Li XZ. Carotenoid composition in the green microalga Chlorococcum. Food Chem. 2002;76(3):319–25. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00279-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Kou Y, Liu M, Sun P, Dong Z, Liu J. High light boosts salinity stress-induced biosynthesis of astaxanthin and lipids in the green alga Chromochloris zofingiensis. Algal Res. 2020;50: 101976. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.algal.2020.101976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Khalili Z, Jalili H, Noroozi M, Amrane A. Effect of linoleic acid and methyl jasmonate on astaxanthin content of Scenedesmus acutus and Chlorella sorokiniana under heterotrophic cultivation and salt shock conditions. J Appl Phycol. 2019;31(5):2811–22. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10811-019-01782-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Juan P, Kai Y, Jian Ping Y, Guang Xia C, Min X, Chou Fei W, Jiang HW. Characterization of a newly isolated green microalga Scenedesmus sp. as a potential source of biodiesel. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11(94):16083–94. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5897/AJB12.1319.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Lafarga T. Effect of microalgal biomass incorporation into foods: Nutritional and sensorial attributes of the end products. Algal Res. 2019;41: 101566. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.algal.2019.101566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Wang B, Zarka A, Trebst A, Boussiba S. Astaxanthin accumulation in Haematococcus pluvialis (Chlorophyceae) as an active photoprotective process under high irradiance1. J Phycol. 2003;39(6):1116–24. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.0022-3646.2003.03-043.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Li Y, Huang J, Sandmann G, Chen F. High-light and sodium chloride stress differentially regulate the biosynthesis of astaxanthin in Chlorella zofingiensis (Chlorophyceae)1. J Phycol. 2009;45(3):635–41. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00689.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Řezanka T, Nedbalová L, Sigler K, Cepák V. Identification of astaxanthin diglucoside diesters from snow alga Chlamydomonas nivalis by liquid chromatography–atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Phytochemistry. 2008;69(2):479–90. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.06.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Orosa M, Valero JF, Herrero C, Abalde J. Comparison of the accumulation of astaxanthin in Haematococcus pluvialis and other green microalgae under N-starvation and high light conditions. Biotechnol Lett. 2001;23(13):1079–85. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1023/A:1010510508384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Chekanov K, Lobakova E, Selyakh I, Semenova L, Sidorov R, Solovchenko A. Accumulation of astaxanthin by a new Haematococcus pluvialis strain bm1 from the white sea coastal rocks (Russia). Mar Drugs. 2014;12(8):4504–20. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/md12084504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Gong Z, Xiong L, Shi H, Yang S, Herrera-Estrella LR, Xu G, Chao DY, Li J, Wang PY, Qin F, Li J, Ding Y, Shi Y, Wang Y, Yang Y, Guo Y, Zhu JK. Plant abiotic stress response and nutrient use efficiency. Sci China Life Sci. 2020;63(5):635–74. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11427-020-1683-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Choi WG, Toyota M, Kim SH, Hilleary R, Gilroy S. Salt stress-induced Ca 2+ waves are associated with rapid, long-distance root-to-shoot signaling in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(17):6497–502. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1073/pnas.1319955111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Wheeler GL, Brownlee C. Ca2+ signalling in plants and green algae—changing channels. Trends Plant Sci. 2008;13(9):506–14. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tplants.2008.06.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Mekonnen DW, Flügge UI, Ludewig F. Gamma-aminobutyric acid depletion affects stomata closure and drought tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci. 2016;245:25–34. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.01.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Khanna RR, Jahan B, Iqbal N, Khan NA, AlAjmi MF, Tabish Rehman M, Khan MIR. GABA reverses salt-inhibited photosynthetic and growth responses through its influence on NO-mediated nitrogen-sulfur assimilation and antioxidant system in wheat. J Biotechnol. 2021;325:73–82. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2020.11.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Barbosa JM, Singh NK, Cherry JH, Locy RD. Nitrate uptake and utilization is modulated by exogenous γ-aminobutyric acid in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48(6):443–50. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.01.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Salah A, Zhan M, Cao C, Han Y, Ling L, Liu Z, Li P, Ye M, Jiang Y. γ-Aminobutyric acid promotes chloroplast ultrastructure, antioxidant capacity, and growth of waterlogged maize seedlings. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):484. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41598-018-36334-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Priya M, Sharma L, Kaur R, Bindumadhava H, Nair RM, Siddique KHM, Nayyar H. GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid), as a thermo-protectant, to improve the reproductive function of heat-stressed mungbean plants. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):7788. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41598-019-44163-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Beuve N, Rispail N, Laine P, Cliquet JB, Ourry A, Le Deunff E. Putative role of γ-aminobutyric acid (Gaba) as a long-distance signal in up-regulation of nitrate uptake in Brassica napus L. Plant Cell Environ. 2004;27(8):1035–46. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01208.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Siddiqui MH, Al-Whaibi MH, Basalah MO. Role of nitric oxide in tolerance of plants to abiotic stress. Protoplasma. 2011;248(3):447–55. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00709-010-0206-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Procházková D, Haisel D, Wilhelmová N, Pavlíková D, Száková J. Effects of exogenous nitric oxide on photosynthesis. Photosynthetica. 2013;51(4):483–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11099-013-0053-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Arif Y, Singh P, Siddiqui H, Bajguz A, Hayat S. Salinity induced physiological and biochemical changes in plants: an omic approach towards salt stress tolerance. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;156:64–77. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.08.042.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Betzen BM, Smart CM, Maricle KL, MariCle BR. Effects of increasing salinity on photosynthesis and plant water potential in Kansas salt marsh species. Trans Kans Acad Sci. 2019;122(1–2):49. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1660/062.122.0105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Li Q, You J, Qiao T, Zhong D, Yu X. Sodium chloride stimulates the biomass and astaxanthin production by Haematococcus pluvialis via a two-stage cultivation strategy. Bioresour Technol. 2022;344: 126214. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126214.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Elloumi W, Jebali A, Maalej A, Chamkha M, Sayadi S. Effect of mild salinity stress on the growth, fatty acid and carotenoid compositions, and biological activities of the thermal freshwater microalgae Scenedesmus sp. Biomolecules. 2020;10(11):1515. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/biom10111515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Lv H, Kim M, Park S, Baek K, Oh H, Polle JEW, Jin E. Comparative transcriptome analysis of short-term responses to salt and glycerol hyperosmotic stress in the green alga Dunaliella salina. Algal Res. 2021;53: 102147. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.algal.2020.102147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Morales-Sánchez D, Kim Y, Terng EL, Peterson L, Cerutti H. A multidomain enzyme, with glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and phosphatase activities, is involved in a chloroplastic pathway for glycerol synthesis in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant J. 2017;90(6):1079–92. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/tpj.13530.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Tang X, Mu X, Shao H, Wang H, Brestic M. Global plant-responding mechanisms to salt stress: physiological and molecular levels and implications in biotechnology. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2015;35(4):425–37. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3109/07388551.2014.889080.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Kato Y, Ho SH, Vavricka CJ, Chang JS, Hasunuma T, Kondo A. Evolutionary engineering of salt-resistant Chlamydomonas sp. strains reveals salinity stress-activated starch-to-lipid biosynthesis switching. Bioresour Technol. 2017;245:1484–90. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Cheng R, Feng J, Zhang BX, Huang Y, Cheng J, Zhang CX. Transcriptome and gene expression analysis of an oleaginous diatom under different salinity conditions. Bioenergy Res. 2014;7(1):192–205. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12155-013-9360-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Jha UC, Bohra A, Jha R, Parida SK. Salinity stress response and ‘omics’ approaches for improving salinity stress tolerance in major grain legumes. Plant Cell Rep. 2019;38(3):255–77. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00299-019-02374-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Shah Md MR, Liang Y, Cheng JJ, Daroch M. Astaxanthin-producing green microalga Haematococcus pluvialis: From single cell to high value commercial products. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:531. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fpls.2016.00531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Sarada R, Bhattacharya S, Ravishankar GA. Optimization of culture conditions for growth of the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;18(6):517–21. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1023/A:1016349828310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Xing H, Zhao Y, Li T, Han B, Zhao P, Yu X. Enhancing astaxanthin and lipid coproduction in Haematococcus pluvialis by the combined induction of plant growth regulators and multiple stresses. Bioresour Technol. 2022;344: 126225. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126225.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Boussiba S, Vonshak A. Astaxanthin accumulation in the green alga Haematococcus pluvialis1. Plant Cell Physiol. 1991;32(7):1077–82. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078171.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Del Campo JA, Rodrguez H, Moreno J, Vargas M, Rivas J, Guerrero MG. Accumulation of astaxanthin and lutein in Chlorella zofingiensis (Chlorophyta). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;64(6):848–54. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00253-003-1510-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Idenyi JN, Eya JC, Nwankwegu AS, Nwoba EG. Aquaculture sustainability through alternative dietary ingredients: Microalgal value-added products. Eng Microbiol. 2022;2(4): 100049. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.engmic.2022.100049.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Bermejo E, Ruiz-Domínguez MC, Cuaresma M, Vaquero I, Ramos-Merchante A, Vega JM, Vílchez C, Garbayo I. Production of lutein, and polyunsaturated fatty acids by the acidophilic eukaryotic microalga Coccomyxa onubensis under abiotic stress by salt or ultraviolet light. J Biosci Bioeng. 2018;125(6):669–75. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2017.12.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Charioui I, Chikhaoui M, Filali FE, Abbassi M, Banaoui A, Kaaya A. Production in cell biomass and carotenoids under the effect of a saline stress in microalgae Dunaliella spp. isolated from Moroccan saharian saline. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(8):286–94. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.038.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Li Q, Zhao Y, Ding W, Han B, Geng S, Ning D, Ma T, Yu X. Gamma-aminobutyric acid facilitates the simultaneous production of biomass, astaxanthin and lipids in Haematococcus pluvialis under salinity and high-light stress conditions. Bioresour Technol. 2021;320: 124418. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Ben-Amotz A, Avron M. On the factors which determine massive β-carotene accumulation in the halotolerant alga Dunaliella bardawil. Plant Physiol. 1983;72(3):593–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1104/pp.72.3.593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Chen QH, Wu BK, Pan D, Sang LX, Chang B. β-Carotene and its protective effect on gastric cancer. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9(23):6591–607. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i23.6591.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Tanguy G, Legat A, Gonçalves O, Marchal L, Schoefs B. Selection of culture conditions and cell morphology for biocompatible extraction of β-carotene from Dunaliella salina. Mar Drugs. 2021;19(11):648. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/md19110648.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Fang N, Wang C, Liu X, Zhao X, Liu Y, Liu X, Du Y, Zhang Z, Zhang H. De novo synthesis of astaxanthin: from organisms to genes. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2019;92:162–71. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.08.016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Patil AD, Kasabe PJ, Dandge PB. Pharmaceutical and nutraceutical potential of natural bioactive pigment: Astaxanthin. Nat Prod Bioprospect. 2022;12(1):25. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s13659-022-00347-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Bjørklund G, Gasmi A, Lenchyk L, Shanaida M, Zafar S, Mujawdiya PK, Lysiuk R, Antonyak H, Noor S, Akram M, Smetanina K, Piscopo S, Upyr T, Peana M. The role of astaxanthin as a nutraceutical in health and age-related conditions. Molecules. 2022;27(21):7167. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/molecules27217167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Jannel S, Caro Y, Bermudes M, Petit T. Novel insights into the biotechnological production of Haematococcus pluvialis-derived astaxanthin: Advances and key challenges to allow its industrial use as novel food ingredient. J Mar Sci Eng. 2020;8(10):789. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/jmse8100789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Gong M, Bassi A. Carotenoids from microalgae: a review of recent developments. Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34(8):1396–412. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.10.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Torres-Tiji Y, Fields FJ, Mayfield SP. Microalgae as a future food source. Biotechnol Adv. 2020;41: 107536. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107536.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Wan M, Hou D, Li Y, Fan J, Huang J, Liang S, Wang W, Pan R, Wang J, Li S. The effective photoinduction of Haematococcus pluvialis for accumulating astaxanthin with attached cultivation. Bioresour Technol. 2014;163:26–32. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Hamed I. The evolution and versatility of microalgal biotechnology: A review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2016;15(6):1104–23. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/1541-4337.12227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Turrin NP, Rivest S. Molecular and cellular immune mediators of neuroprotection. Mol Neurobiol. 2006;34(3):221–42. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1385/MN:34:3:221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Galasso C, Orefice I, Pellone P, Cirino P, Miele R, Ianora A, Brunet C, Sansone C. On the neuroprotective role of astaxanthin: new perspectives? Mar Drugs. 2018;16(8):247. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/md16080247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Grimmig B, Kim SH, Nash K, Bickford PC, Douglas SR. Neuroprotective mechanisms of astaxanthin: a potential therapeutic role in preserving cognitive function in age and neurodegeneration. GeroScience. 2017;39(1):19–32. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11357-017-9958-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Yuan J, Peng J, Yin K, Wang J. Potential health-promoting effects of astaxanthin: a high-value carotenoid mostly from microalgae. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2011;55(1):150–65. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/mnfr.201000414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Wang L, Liu Z, Jiang H, Mao X. Biotechnology advances in β-carotene production by microorganisms. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021;111:322–32. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.077.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Jain D, Meena M, Singh D, Janmeda P. Isolation, development and validation of HPTLC method for the estimation of β-carotene from Gymnosporia senegalensis (Lam.) Loes. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2023;201:107843. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.107843.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Sathasivam R, Ki JS. A review of the biological activities of microalgal carotenoids and their potential use in healthcare and cosmetic industries. Mar Drugs. 2018;16(1):26. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/md16010026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Gateau H, Solymosi K, Marchand J, Schoefs B. Carotenoids of microalgae used in food industry and medicine. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2017;17(13):1140–72. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2174/1389557516666160808123841.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Qiang S, Su AP, Li Y, Chen Z, Hu CY, Meng YH. Elevated β-carotene synthesis by the engineered Rhodobacter sphaeroides with enhanced crty expression. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67(34):9560–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b02597.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Jahnke LS. Massive carotenoid accumulation in Dunaliella bardawil induced by ultraviolet-A radiation. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 1999;48(1):68–74. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S1011-1344(99)00012-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Koyande AK, Chew KW, Rambabu K, Tao Y, Chu DT, Show PL. Microalgae: a potential alternative to health supplementation for humans. Food Sci Hum Wellness. 2019;8(1):16–24. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.fshw.2019.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Marino T, Casella P, Sangiorgio P, Verardi A, Ferraro A, Hristoforou E, Molino A, Musmarraa D. Natural beta-carotene: a microalgae derivate for nutraceutical applications. Chem Eng. 2020;79:103–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3303/CET2079018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Favas R, Morone J, Martins R, Vasconcelos V, Lopes G. Cyanobacteria and microalgae bioactive compounds in skin-ageing: potential to restore extracellular matrix filling and overcome hyperpigmentation. J Enzym Inhib Med Chem. 2021;36(1):1829–38. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/14756366.2021.1960830.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. Leach G, Oliveira G, Morais R. Production of a carotenoid-rich product by alginate entrapment and fluid-bed drying of Dunaliella salina. J Sci Food Agric. 1998;76(2):298–302. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/(SICI)1097.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Tsuchihashi H, Kigoshi M, Iwatsuki M, Niki E. Action of β-carotene as an antioxidant against lipid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1995;323(1):137–47. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1006/abbi.1995.0019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Maria AG, Graziano R, Nicolantonio D. Carotenoids: potential allies of cardiovascular health? Food Nutr Res. 2015;59(1):26762. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3402/fnr.v59.26762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Wang J, Hu X, Chen J, Wang T, Huang X, Chen G. The extraction of β-carotene from microalgae for testing their health benefits. Foods. 2022;11(4):502. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/foods11040502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Supamattaya K, Kiriratnikom S, Boonyaratpalin M, Borowitzka L. Effect of a Dunaliella extract on growth performance, health condition, immune response and disease resistance in black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon). Aquaculture. 2005;248(1–4):207–16. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.04.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Kumar S, Hosokawa M, Miyashita K. Fucoxanthin: a marine carotenoid exerting anti-cancer effects by affecting multiple mechanisms. Mar Drugs. 2013;11(12):5130–47. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/md11125130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  141. Toma S, Losardo PL, Vincent M, Palumbo R. Effectiveness of β-carotene in cancer chemoprevention. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1995;4(3):213–24. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1097/00008469-199506000-00002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Jyonouchi H, Sun S, Iijima K, Gross MD. Antitumor activity of astaxanthin and its mode of action. Nutr Cancer. 2000;36(1):59–65. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1207/S15327914NC3601_9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Finkel T, Holbrook NJ. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature. 2000;408(6809):239–47. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/35041687.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Sharifi-Rad M, Mnayer D, Morais-Braga MFB, Carneiro JNP, Bezerra CF, Coutinho HDM, Salehi B, Martorell M, Del Mar CM, Soltani-Nejad A, Uribe YAH, Yousaf Z, Iriti M, Sharifi-Rad J. Echinacea plants as antioxidant and antibacterial agents: from traditional medicine to biotechnological applications. Phytother Res. 2018;32(9):1653–63. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/ptr.6101.

  145. Gauthier MR, Senhorinho GNA, Scott JA. Microalgae under environmental stress as a source of antioxidants. Algal Res. 2020;52: 102104. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.algal.2020.102104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Sansone C, Brunet C. Promises and challenges of microalgal antioxidant production. Antioxidants. 2019;8(7):199. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/antiox8070199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Seth K, Kumar A, Rastogi RP, Meena M, Vinayak V, Harish. Bioprospecting of fucoxanthin from diatoms—challenges and perspectives. Algal Res. 2021;60:102475. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.algal.2021.102475

  148. Raposo M, De Morais A, De Morais R. Carotenoids from marine microalgae: a valuable natural source for the prevention of chronic diseases. Mar Drugs. 2015;13(8):5128–55. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/md13085128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Kadam SU, Tiwari BK, O’Donnell CP. Application of novel extraction technologies for bioactives from marine algae. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61(20):4667–75. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1021/jf400819p.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Wu Q, Zhang XS, Wang HD, Zhang X, Yu Q, Li W, Zhou ML, Wang XL. Astaxanthin activates nuclear factor erythroid-related factor 2 and the antioxidant responsive element (Nrf2-are) pathway in the brain after subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats and attenuates early brain injury. Mar Drugs. 2014;12(12):6125–41. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/md12126125.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Xue XL, Han XD, Li Y, Chu XF, Miao WM, Zhang JL, Fan SJ. Astaxanthin attenuates total body irradiation-induced hematopoietic system injury in mice via inhibition of oxidative stress and apoptosis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8(1):7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13287-016-0464-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  152. Ávila-Román J, García-Gil S, Rodríguez-Luna A, Motilva V, Talero E. Anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects of microalgal carotenoids. Mar Drugs. 2021;19(10):531. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/md19100531.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  153. Ucci M, Di Tomo P, Tritschler F, Cordone VGP, Lanuti P, Bologna G, Di Silvestre S, Di Pietro N, Pipino C, Mandatori D, Formoso G, Pandolfi A. Anti-inflammatory role of carotenoids in endothelial cells derived from umbilical cord of women affected by gestational diabetes mellitus. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:1–11. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1155/2019/8184656.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  154. Cho SO, Kim MH, Kim H. β-carotene inhibits activation of nf-κb, activator protein-1, and stat3 and regulates abnormal expression of some adipokines in 3t3-l1 adipocytes. J Cancer Prev. 2018;23(1):37–43. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.15430/JCP.2018.23.1.37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. Bjelakovic G, Nikolova D, Gluud LL, Simonetti RG, Gluud C. Mortality in randomized trials of antioxidant supplements for primary and secondary prevention: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2007;297(8):842–57. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1001/jama.297.8.842.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Liu C, Wang X, Mucci L, Gaziano JM, Zhang SM. Modulation of lung molecular biomarkers by β-carotene in the Physicians’ Health Study. Cancer. 2009;115(5):1049–58. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/cncr.24061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Badak B, Aykanat NEB, Kacar S, Sahinturk V, Arik D, Canaz F. Effects of astaxanthin on metastasis suppressors in ductal carcinoma. A preliminary study. Ann Ital Chir. 2021;92:565–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Su XZ, Chen R, Wang CB, Ouyang XL, Jiang Y, Zhu MY. Astaxanthin combine with human serum albumin to abrogate cell proliferation, migration, and drug-resistant in human ovarian carcinoma skov3 cells. Anti-Cancer Agents Med Chem. 2019;19(6):792–801. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2174/1871520619666190225123003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. Zhao H, Gu H, Zhang H, Li JH, Zhao WE. PPARγ-dependent pathway in the growth-inhibitory effects of K562 cells by carotenoids in combination with rosiglitazone. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2014;1840(1):545–55. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.09.005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. Ylönen K, Alfthan G, Groop L, Saloranta C, Aro A, Virtanen SM. Dietary intakes and plasma concentrations of carotenoids and tocopherols in relation to glucose metabolism in subjects at high risk of type 2 diabetes: The Botnia Dietary Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(6):1434–41. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/ajcn/77.6.1434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Sluijs I, Cadier E, Beulens JW, Spijkerman AM, Van der Schouw YT. Dietary intake of carotenoids and risk of type 2 diabetes. Nutr Metab Cardiovas Dis. 2015;25(4):376–81. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.numecd.2014.12.008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  162. Chen C, Kao A, Tsai Z, Shen Y, Kao P, Ng I, Chang J. Expression of synthetic phytoene synthase gene to enhance β-carotene production in Scenedesmus sp. Cpc2. Biotechnol J. 2017;12(11):1700204. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/biot.201700204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  163. Morikawa T, Uraguchi Y, Sanda S, Nakagawa S, Sawayama S. Overexpression of DnaJ-like chaperone enhances carotenoid synthesis in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2018;184(1):80–91. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12010-017-2521-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Rathod JP, Vira C, Lali AM, Prakash G. Metabolic engineering of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii for enhanced β-carotene and lutein production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2020;190(4):1457–69. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12010-019-03194-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Perozeni F, Cazzaniga S, Baier T, Zanoni F, Zoccatelli G, Lauersen KJ, Wobbe L, Ballottari M. Turning a green alga red: engineering astaxanthin biosynthesis by intragenic pseudogene revival in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18(10):2053–67. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/pbi.13364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  166. Anila N, Simon DP, Chandrashekar A, Ravishankar GA, Sarada R. Metabolic engineering of Dunaliella salina for production of ketocarotenoids. Photosyn Res. 2016;127(3):321–33. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11120-015-0188-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  167. Li X, Yuan Y, Cheng D, Gao J, Kong L, Zhao Q, Wei W, Sun Y. Exploring stress tolerance mechanism of evolved freshwater strain Chlorella sp. S30 under 30 g/L salt. Bioresour Technol. 2018;250:495–504. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.072.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Hu Z, Li Y, Sommerfeld M, Chen F, Hu Q. Enhanced protection against oxidative stress in an astaxanthin-overproduction Haematococcus mutant (Chlorophyceae). Eur J Phycol. 2008;43(4):365–76. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/09670260802227736.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  169. Huang W, Lin Y, He M, Gong Y, Huang J. Induced high-yield production of zeaxanthin, lutein, and β-carotene by a mutant of Chlorella zofingiensis. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(4):891–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Chen Y, Bi C, Zhang J, Hou H, Gong Z. Astaxanthin biosynthesis in transgenic Dunaliella salina (Chlorophyceae) enhanced tolerance to high irradiation stress. South Afr J Bot. 2020;133:132–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.sajb.2020.07.008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  171. Sproles AE, Fields FJ, Smalley TN, Le CH, Badary A, Mayfield SP. Recent advancements in the genetic engineering of microalgae. Algal Res. 2021;53: 102158. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.algal.2020.102158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. Eilers U, Bikoulis A, Breitenbach J, Büchel C, Sandmann G. Limitations in the biosynthesis of fucoxanthin as targets for genetic engineering in Phaeodactylum tricornutum. J Appl Phycol. 2016;28(1):123–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10811-015-0583-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  173. Baek K, Yu J, Jeong J, Sim SJ, Bae S, Jin E. Photoautotrophic production of macular pigment in a Chlamydomonas reinhardtii strain generated by using DNA-free CRISPR-Cas9 RNP-mediated mutagenesis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2018;115(3):719–28. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/bit.26499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Tharek A, Yahya A, Salleh MM, Jamaluddin H, Yoshizaki S, Hara H, Iwamoto K, Suzuki I, Mohamad SE. Improvement and screening of astaxanthin producing mutants of newly isolated Coelastrum sp. using ethyl methane sulfonate induced mutagenesis technique. Biotechnol Rep. 2021;32:e00673. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.btre.2021.e00673.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  175. Cui J, Sun T, Chen L, Zhang W. Engineering salt tolerance of photosynthetic cyanobacteria for seawater utilization. Biotechnol Adv. 2020;43:107578. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107578.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. Baek K, Kim DH, Jeong J, Sim SJ, Melis A, Kim JS, Jin E, Bae S. DNA-free two-gene knockout in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):30620. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/srep30620.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  177. Xu M, Weng Q, Ji J. Applications and advances of CRISPR/Cas9 in animal cancer model. Brief Funct Genomics. 2020;19(3):235–41. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/bfgp/elaa002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Shin SE, Lim JM, Koh HG, Kim EK, Kang NK, Jeon S, Kwon S, Shin WS, Lee B, Hwangbo K, Kim J. CRISPR/Cas9-induced knockout and knock-in mutations in Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):27810. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/srep27810.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  179. Song I, Kim S, Kim J, Oh H, Jang J, Jeong SJ, Baek K, Shin WS, Sim SJ, Jin E. Macular pigment-enriched oil production from genome-edited microalgae. Microb Cell Factories. 2022;21(1):27. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12934-021-01736-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  180. Katiyar R, Gurjar B, Bharti RK, Kumar A, Biswas S, Pruthi V. Heterotrophic cultivation of microalgae in photobioreactor using low cost crude glycerol for enhanced biodiesel production. Renew Energ. 2017;113:1359–65. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  181. Asadian M, Saadati M, Bajestani FB, Beardall J, Abdolahadi F, Mahdinezhad N. Knockout of Cia5 gene using CRISPR/Cas9 technique in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and evaluating CO2 sequestration in control and mutant isolates. J Genet. 2022;101:1–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12041-021-01350-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  182. Lee YY, Park R, Miller SM, Li Y. Genetic compensation of triacylglycerol biosynthesis in the green microalga Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii. Plant J. 2022;111(4):1069–80. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/tpj.15874.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  183. Nguyen AD, Kim D, Lee EY. Unlocking the biosynthesis of sesquiterpenoids from methane via the methylerythritol phosphate pathway in methanotrophic bacteria, using α-humulene as a model compound. Metab Eng. 2020;61:69–78. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ymben.2020.04.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  184. Hu L, Feng S, Liang G, Du J, Li A, Niu C. CRISPR/Cas9-induced β-carotene hydroxylase mutation in Dunaliella salina CCAP19/18. AMB Express. 2021;11(1):83. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13568-021-01242-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  185. Yazdani M, Croen MG, Fish TL, Thannhauser TW, Ahner BA. Overexpression of native ORANGE (Or) and OR mutant protein in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii enhances carotenoid and ABA accumulation and increases resistance to abiotic stress. Metab Eng. 2021;68:94–105. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ymben.2021.09.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  186. León R, Couso I, Fernández E. Metabolic engineering of ketocarotenoids biosynthesis in the unicelullar microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J Biotechnol. 2007;130(2):143–52. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.03.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. Belwal T, Chemat F, Venskutonis PR, Cravotto G, Jaiswal DK, Bhatt ID, Devkota HP, Luo Z. Recent advances in scaling-up of non-conventional extraction techniques: learning from successes and failures. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2020;127: 115895. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.trac.2020.115895.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  188. Kumar M, Sabu S, Sangela V, Meena M, Rajput VD, Minkina T, Vinayak V, Harish. The mechanism of nanoparticle toxicity to cyanobacteria. Arch Microbiol. 2023;205:30. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00203-022-03370-2

  189. Sarkarat R, Mohamadnia S, Tavakoli O. Recent advances in non-conventional techniques for extraction of phycobiliproteins and carotenoids from microalgae. Braz J Chem Eng. 2022;40(2):321–42. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s43153-022-00256-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  190. Hamed I, Moradi M, Ezati P, O’Higgins L, Meléndez-Martínez AJ, Matas RF, Šimat V, McClements DJ, Jakobsen AN, Lerfall J. Encapsulation of microalgal-based carotenoids: recent advances in stability and food applications. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2023;138:382–98. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tifs.2023.06.027.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  191. Sridhar K, Inbaraj BS, Chen B. Recent advances on nanoparticle based strategies for improving carotenoid stability and biological activity. Antioxidants. 2021;10(5):713. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/antiox10050713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  192. Georgiopoulou I, Tzima S, Louli V, Magoulas K. Process optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of chlorophyll, carotenoid and phenolic compounds from Chlorella vulgaris and comparison with conventional and supercritical fluid extraction. Appl Sci. 2023;13(4):2740. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/app13042740.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  193. Shishir MRI, Xie L, Sun C, Zheng X, Chen W. Advances in micro and nano-encapsulation of bioactive compounds using biopolymer and lipid-based transporters. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2018;78:34–60. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.05.018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  194. Santos AMD, Deprá MC, Santos AM, Cichoski AJ, Zepka LQ, Jacob-Lopes E. Sustainability metrics on microalgae-based wastewater treatment system. Desalin Water Treat. 2020;185:51–61. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.5004/dwt.2020.25397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  195. Sangela V, Kumar M, Choudhary S, Gour VS, Meena M, Vinayak V, Harish. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and sodium bicarbonate on lipid production and fatty acid profile in Coelastrella terrestris. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2022;45:102518. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.bcab.2022.102518

  196. Kumar GA, Kumar S, Bhardwaj R, Meena M, Swapnil P, Seth CS, Yadav A. Recent advancements in multifaceted roles of flavonoids in plant–rhizomicrobiome interactions. Front Plant Sci. 2024;14:1297706. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fpls.2023.1297706.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  197. Meena M, Zehra A, Swapnil P, Dubey MK, Patel CB, Upadhyay RS. Effect on lycopene, β-carotene, ascorbic acid and phenolic content in tomato fruits infected by Alternaria alternata and its toxins (TeA, AOH and AME). Arch Phytopath Plant Protect. 2017;50(7–8):317–29. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/03235408.2017.1312769.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  198. Deprá MC, Severo IA, Santos AMD, Zepka LQ, Jacob-Lopes E. Environmental impacts on commercial microalgae-based products: Sustainability metrics and indicators. Algal Res. 2020;51: 102056. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.algal.2020.102056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  199. Romagnoli F, Spaccini F, Boggia A, Paoli R, Feofilovs M, Ieviņa B, Rocchi L. Microalgae cultivation in a biogas plant: environmental and economic assessment through a life cycle approach. Biomass Bioenergy. 2024;182: 107116. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are also grateful to their respective universities for providing support during the work. All the authors read and approve the content of the manuscript for publication.

Funding

This study did not receive any specific grant from public, commercial, or non-profit funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.: conceptualization, writing—original draft, writing draft—review and editing. R.B.: conceptualization, writing—original draft, writing draft—review and editing. A.Y.: conceptualization, writing—original draft, writing draft—review and editing. P.S.: investigation, conceptualization, resources, data curation, writing—original draft, writing draft—review and editing, supervision, project administration. M.M.: investigation, conceptualization, resources, data curation, writing—original draft, writing draft—review and editing, project administration. All the authors reviewed and edited the contents. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Prashant Swapnil or Mukesh Meena.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors gave their consent to publish their work.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aditi, Bhardwaj, R., Yadav, A. et al. Characterization of microalgal β-carotene and astaxanthin: exploring their health-promoting properties under the effect of salinity and light intensity. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 18, 18 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13068-025-02612-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13068-025-02612-x

Keywords